Category: coaching

  • A year on: culture, uncertainty and looking ahead

    A year on: culture, uncertainty and looking ahead

    Around this time last year, I wrote a blog reflecting on my first two years as CEO of Scottish Drugs Forum.

    At the time, I wrote about stepping into a role shaped by nearly four decades of leadership, the realities of leading through uncertainty, the challenge of funding pressures, and my ambition to build a culture of care alongside a stronger strategic focus.

    A year on, I thought it was worth revisiting some of those reflections.

    Not because everything has changed, but because much of what has happened over the past year has reinforced just how important culture is when organisations are navigating uncertainty.

    Openness in uncertain times

    The past year has brought no shortage of challenges.

    As Scotland’s National Mission on Drugs moves into its next phase, there has been significant uncertainty across the sector about future priorities, funding and sustainability. Anyone working in this space will understand the impact that uncertainty can have, not just on organisations, but on the people working within them.

    Uncertainty doesn’t become easier by avoiding it.

    We’ve tried to be open and transparent with our staff about the challenges we face, the decisions we’re making and the realities of the environment we’re operating within. That doesn’t mean always having the answers. It means creating a culture where people understand what’s happening, feel trusted with information and know they won’t be shielded from difficult conversations.

    I believe people cope better with uncertainty when they feel included rather than protected from reality.

    Culture isn’t what you say, it’s what people experience

    Last year I wrote about wanting to create a culture that genuinely valued wellbeing, compassion and care.

    This year I’ve seen more evidence of that culture taking root.

    Not through policies or statements (although there’s been a few of those too!), but through how people support each other, how difficult conversations are approached, and how teams respond when things become challenging.

    Retention continues to be one of our strengths, something I don’t take for granted. We’ve also welcomed new colleagues who have brought fresh perspectives and ideas, while strengthening the values and culture that already existed.

    Culture is often talked about as though it’s something leaders create.

    I believe that leaders can influence culture, but culture is ultimately built collectively through the everyday actions, behaviours and relationships that people experience at work.

    Creating space for lived and living experience leadership

    One of the most encouraging developments over the past year has been seeing the continued growth and confidence of people with lived and (especially) living experience within our networks.

    I’ve watched people step forward, challenge assumptions, influence conversations and speak with increasing confidence in spaces where their voices have historically been absent or overlooked.

    Our role isn’t to speak for people.

    It’s to create opportunities, remove barriers and ensure that people’s expertise is recognised and valued.

    What has been particularly powerful is seeing individuals increasingly use those opportunities to influence change themselves.

    That feels like real progress.

    We remain committed to ensuring that people who use substances are central to shaping policies, strategies and services. Not as a token gesture, but because better decisions are made when the people most affected are actively involved in making them.

    Looking beyond survival

    A significant part of any CEO role is securing the future of the organisation.

    It’s probably the least visible part of leadership, but often the part that occupies the most headspace.

    Funding remains a constant consideration and, if I’m honest, a constant responsibility. The challenge is balancing the need to secure sustainability while continuing to focus on impact.

    We’ve spent a lot of time this year thinking carefully about what we want to achieve, where we can make the greatest contribution and how we ensure we’re building something sustainable for the future.

    Like many organisations, we have no shortage of ideas.

    The challenge isn’t finding things to do.

    The challenge is deciding what to prioritise and ensuring that we do those things well.

    Continuing to evolve

    The past year has also reinforced something I touched on in my previous reflection: no single organisation can solve this crisis alone.

    Collaboration remains critical.

    The challenges associated with drug-related harm are inseparable from wider issues of poverty, inequality, trauma, mental health and social exclusion. Progress depends on organisations working together, recognising each other’s strengths and being prepared to share influence.

    Looking ahead, one area I’m particularly interested in and currently developing further is how we create more opportunities for reflection, learning and coaching within our own organisation.

    The better we support people to grow, think and develop, the better equipped we are to respond to the challenges ahead.

    Looking forward

    A year ago, I wrote about balancing legacy and evolution.

    I think that remains true.

    There have been difficult moments over the past year, including periods where public debate became increasingly polarised and where our work and intentions were misrepresented. There have also been moments of genuine progress, optimism and growth.

    Through all of it, my commitment to this work remains unchanged.

    The challenges are significant, but so is the determination of the people working to address them.

    And whilst uncertainty remains, so does our belief that change is possible.

  • Finishing my ILM Level 7 Diploma for Executive and Senior Level Coaches & Mentors

    Finishing my ILM Level 7 Diploma for Executive and Senior Level Coaches & Mentors

    Last week felt like a significant milestone… I submitted the final parts of my portfolio of evidence and assignments for the Institute of Leadership and Management (ILM) Level 7 Diploma for Executive and Senior Level Coaches and Mentors.

    Everything is currently being marked, so I’m fully expecting there may still be bits to revisit, but it finally feels like the end is in sight.

    I’ve actually genuinely enjoyed the process.

    I started the course in August 2025 and, at the time, I remember actively looking for honest reflections from people who had completed it. I wanted to know what it was  actually  like beyond the course description – the workload, the coaching hours, the written assignments, the balance alongside full-time leadership roles and, realistically, whether it was manageable.

    So this is my attempt at offering that perspective for anyone considering doing it themselves.

    Choosing a provider

    The experience of the qualification will vary depending on who delivers it. I chose to complete mine through Stirling Enterprise HR (STEP HR) after coming across them online and having an initial conversation with the course leader.

    One of the biggest advantages for me was that they were local and delivered the workshops face-to-face, which was appealing to me. Coaching is relational by nature and I liked the idea of learning and practising in person rather than entirely online.

    The group itself was small and made up of people from very different backgrounds and organisations, which added a lot to the experience. Some people were completing the Level 5 qualification and others the Level 7, with the main differences being the number of workshops, depth of the written assignments, number of coaching hours required and types of coachees (executive or senior leaders for the Level 7).

    The workshops

    The workshops took place once a month and were full-day sessions.

    They were interactive and practical rather than overly academic, which suited me well. There was some presentation-based learning and theory, but most of the time involved discussions, reflective exercises and breaking into smaller groups to coach each other.

    That was probably one of the most valuable parts of the course for me – actually practising repeatedly and experiencing both sides of the coaching relationship.

    It also quickly became apparent that true, non-directive coaching is much harder than it looks.

    Listening well sounds simple in theory until you realise how quickly your brain wants to jump into problem-solving, advice-giving or trying to ‘help’ too quickly.

    The assignments

    If I’m honest, the written assignments were probably my least favourite part of the course.

    The first assignment was in 3 parts and involved a significant amount of theory and required learning the style of academic and reflective writing expected by ILM. It wasn’t that they were asking anything particularly difficult, it was more the style expectations that took a bit of adjustment.

    I much preferred the actual coaching itself.

    And if I’m going to write, I’d generally rather it’s a blog than an academic assignment.

    That said, the written work did force me to think much more critically about ethics, boundaries, reflective practice and my own approach to coaching, which was valuable in itself.

    The coaching hours

    One thing I definitely underestimated was the amount of time involved in completing the coaching practice element.

    The recommendation was to work with around 6–9 coachees across the qualification. I got a bit overenthusiastic and ended up coaching 11 people, including members of my own leadership team and several external colleagues.

    In hindsight, I probably wouldn’t recommend taking that approach.

    The actual coaching sessions were manageable, but it was the preparation, reflection and paperwork surrounding them that became substantial. Every session required records, reflective notes, evaluations and ongoing documentation, and it added up very quickly alongside a full-time CEO role.

    The qualification required 60 hours of coaching overall and, if I was doing it again, I’d probably space sessions out more and work with fewer people. Part of the problem I gave myself was that, despite having 3 years to complete the course, I set myself a target of completing within the first year.

    Although saying that, throwing myself into it did accelerate my learning significantly. So pros and cons!

    Having regular coaching conversations week after week forced me to develop confidence quickly, sharpen my listening skills and stay fully engaged with the process.

    The portfolio and paperwork

    Assignment two involved a huge amount of portfolio evidence.

    This included:

    • coaching records
    • reflective diaries
    • signed contracts and agreements
    • coaching needs analyses
    • evaluations
    • supervision records
    • observed coaching documentation
    • summaries

    At times it genuinely felt never-ending.

    One thing that helped massively was creating systems early on to keep everything organised. I built a coaching tracker spreadsheet to manage sessions, hours, supervisions and paperwork and had a well oiled machine of storing all the reflective diaries in secure folders. The spreadsheet tracker has actually become something I’ll continue using beyond the qualification itself and I’m happy to share it for others doing the course or just looking for a simple tool – there’s a link at the end of this post for you to download it.

    Assignment three focused more heavily on reflection, self-assessment and future development, including a SWOT analysis and CPD planning for the next 12 months. Again, a significant amount of effort but very practical and useful beyond the course which I enjoyed.

    Learning beyond the classroom

    A huge amount of the learning for me happened outside the workshops themselves.

    I spent (and still do spend) a lot of time reading, listening to podcasts and watching coaching-related content because I genuinely wanted to be the best coach I could be for the people who had trusted me with their time and openness throughout the process.

    The qualification also made me reflect much more deeply on how I show up in leadership conversations generally – particularly around listening, creating space, resisting the urge to jump into solutions and understanding the difference between mentoring, advising and coaching.

    Looking back on the experience

    Looking back, I probably did approach the qualification in the same way I approach a lot of things – by jumping in fully and figuring it out as I went.

    Balancing the coaching hours, written assignments and portfolio requirements alongside an executive leadership role was definitely challenging at times.

    But despite the workload, I’m genuinely glad I did it.

    Not just because of the qualification itself, but because of how much it has changed the way I think about leadership, support and development.

    It’s made me more reflective, more intentional and much more aware of the importance of creating space for people to think openly and work through challenges in their own way.

    And ultimately, that feels like something worth investing in.


    Download my free and fully customisable coaching and supervision tracker here

    Name
    Marketing email consent
  • Why I decided to do a coaching qualification as a CEO

    Why I decided to do a coaching qualification as a CEO

    It’s International Coaching Week so I’ve decided to write about why I decided to do a coaching qualification alongside my role as a CEO. How I found the time, well… more on that in a future episode!

    The honest answer is that my decision came from a few different experiences over time that gradually made me realise I wanted a more structured and intentional way of supporting people.

    Working from instinct

    A big part of it started through conversations with an external colleague and ally who was moving into a national role. He asked if I would provide some supervision and space for reflection as he stepped into the position, and I was honoured to be asked so happily agreed.

    Those discussions were really interesting, and he was kind enough to say he found them helpful. But throughout the sessions I was definitely thinking: surely there’s a way I could be more useful here.

    A lot of what I was doing came naturally through experience as a mental health nurse providing support and supervision, leadership and years of working closely with people, but I became increasingly aware that I was relying heavily on instinct. The conversations often leaned towards mentoring – sharing perspective, advice and reflections from my own experience – and whilst that absolutely has value, it also made me curious about how I could support people in a more intentional and skilled way.

    Being coached as a leader

    At the same time, I’d had coaching and mentoring myself during my first year in post as a CEO through the Charity Leadership Scotland programme, as well as some group coaching through Kate Waterfall Hill’s leadership accelerator programme.

    I found both experiences genuinely beneficial.

    It wasn’t about somebody giving me answers, although that would have been nice at times! In fact, it was often the opposite. It was having space to think, reflect and properly work things through with someone who listened differently and asked better questions than I was perhaps asking myself.

    It challenged me in a positive way and made me reflect on how powerful good coaching can be – particularly in leadership roles, where there can often be pressure to appear certain, capable and clear all the time.

    I started to realise that coaching wasn’t just about performance or development in a formal sense. It was also about creating space for people to think more honestly, build confidence in themselves and work through challenges in a way that felt constructive rather than overwhelming.

    Wanting to do it well

    The more I reflected on all of this, the more I knew I wanted to learn properly.

    I started researching coaching qualifications and looking at different providers before eventually finding a course locally that felt like the right fit for me. I was also very lucky to have support from my Board who understood the value of my vision.

    Part of the decision was definitely about wanting to strengthen how I support others individually. But it was also more than that.

    A lot of my thinking on this is about the environments people work in – particularly purpose-driven environments where people care deeply about what they do and the people they support.

    I’m increasingly interested in what helps people perform at their best in these settings, and what role leadership, reflection and coaching can play in that.

    I also wanted to think more about what a coaching culture could look like within organisations, and whether there are ways to create more space for reflection, development and supportive challenge in day-to-day work. That’s something I’m still working on, and something I’ll definitely write more about in future.

    Listening differently

    What I know so far is that doing the qualification has already made me think differently.

    About listening.
    About resisting the urge to jump straight into solutions.
    About how often people already hold the answers they need, but rarely get the space to properly work through them.

    And, maybe most importantly, it’s made me reflect more on my own behaviours and how I show up myself. Not just as a leader, but as someone who genuinely wants to support people well.